<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Jigsaw Data following privacy standards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2006/09/08/is-jigsaw-data-following-privacy-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2006/09/08/is-jigsaw-data-following-privacy-standards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spokaneman</title>
		<link>http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2006/09/08/is-jigsaw-data-following-privacy-standards/#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokaneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2006/09/08/is-jigsaw-data-following-privacy-standards/#comment-2306</guid>
		<description>Having worked at Jigsaw for a period of time, I can tell you this issue was brought up by a number of customers and potential customers.

One potential client said &quot;it is a great idea, but you are going to get sued like crazy&quot; when I tried to sell him the membership. Jigsaw is positive that they don&#039;t have anything to worry about. Legally, they may be in the clear but ethically, that is a whole new ball of wax.

Fowler is a very charismatic guy and he sells this idea all the way to the bank. He says that all this information is public, since it is what would be on a business card, therfore he is not crossing privacy lines. Also, since no cell phone numbers or home numbers are allowed, the executive&#039;s privacy is not being compromised.

I just remember having a lot of clients questioning the ethics of this model and I lost sales because of the uncomfortable nature of what I was selling. It was always a touchy subject with clients and Jigsaw management always got defensive when the issue was brought up by Account Executives.

I think when Fowler started he ignored the naysayers and only focused on the positive reactions. He had me sold on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked at Jigsaw for a period of time, I can tell you this issue was brought up by a number of customers and potential customers.</p>
<p>One potential client said &#8220;it is a great idea, but you are going to get sued like crazy&#8221; when I tried to sell him the membership. Jigsaw is positive that they don&#8217;t have anything to worry about. Legally, they may be in the clear but ethically, that is a whole new ball of wax.</p>
<p>Fowler is a very charismatic guy and he sells this idea all the way to the bank. He says that all this information is public, since it is what would be on a business card, therfore he is not crossing privacy lines. Also, since no cell phone numbers or home numbers are allowed, the executive&#8217;s privacy is not being compromised.</p>
<p>I just remember having a lot of clients questioning the ethics of this model and I lost sales because of the uncomfortable nature of what I was selling. It was always a touchy subject with clients and Jigsaw management always got defensive when the issue was brought up by Account Executives.</p>
<p>I think when Fowler started he ignored the naysayers and only focused on the positive reactions. He had me sold on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
