<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia could shut within 3-4 months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-could-shut-within-3-4-months/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-could-shut-within-3-4-months/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish D Vishwakarma</title>
		<link>http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-could-shut-within-3-4-months/#comment-10900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish D Vishwakarma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-could-shut-within-3-4-months/#comment-10900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wiki is doing a good job, rather great job. But compaies like microsoft, britanica will like to let it die, so that their encyclopedia could be sold. In this age, I dont think any one need encyclopedia of microsoft, britanica or else. Net is more than enought and there are various sites like wiki, but not the same scale. I hope it survive. Or someone adopt it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiki is doing a good job, rather great job. But compaies like microsoft, britanica will like to let it die, so that their encyclopedia could be sold. In this age, I dont think any one need encyclopedia of microsoft, britanica or else. Net is more than enought and there are various sites like wiki, but not the same scale. I hope it survive. Or someone adopt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-could-shut-within-3-4-months/#comment-10715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techaddress.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/wikipedia-could-shut-within-3-4-months/#comment-10715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ouch, hadn&#039;t heard about this. They really should consider even a little advertising on the site, so long as they are clearly marked as adverts i can&#039;t see the harm. A resource as good as this is worth it in my oppinion.

I&#039;ve read alot about wikiusers saying they&#039;d leave if it had ads - oh well! If it can&#039;t support itself with the level of donations it&#039;s recieving maybe it&#039;s something they need to consider. I can&#039;t see Google Adsense doing much harm in one bar per page. Reference.com uses advertising and i still find it highly useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, hadn&#8217;t heard about this. They really should consider even a little advertising on the site, so long as they are clearly marked as adverts i can&#8217;t see the harm. A resource as good as this is worth it in my oppinion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read alot about wikiusers saying they&#8217;d leave if it had ads &#8211; oh well! If it can&#8217;t support itself with the level of donations it&#8217;s recieving maybe it&#8217;s something they need to consider. I can&#8217;t see Google Adsense doing much harm in one bar per page. Reference.com uses advertising and i still find it highly useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
